The case, Citizens United v. FEC, presents some very difficult free speech questions, and I'm deeply ambivalent about the court's ruling. There are several dubious aspects of the majority's opinion (principally its decision to invalidate the entire campaign finance scheme rather than exercising "judicial restraint" through a narrower holding). Beyond that, I believe that corporate influence over our political process is easily one of the top sicknesses afflicting our political culture. But there are also very real First Amendment interests implicated by laws which bar entities from spending money to express political viewpoints.
Judge Rebukes Trump Administration’s Effort to Return Abrego Garcia From El
Salvador
-
The judge also said she planned to force Trump officials to reveal what
they had done behind the scenes to seek the return of the man, Kilmar
Armando Abreg...
12 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment