The case, Citizens United v. FEC, presents some very difficult free speech questions, and I'm deeply ambivalent about the court's ruling. There are several dubious aspects of the majority's opinion (principally its decision to invalidate the entire campaign finance scheme rather than exercising "judicial restraint" through a narrower holding). Beyond that, I believe that corporate influence over our political process is easily one of the top sicknesses afflicting our political culture. But there are also very real First Amendment interests implicated by laws which bar entities from spending money to express political viewpoints.
Trump's $300B Iran investment fund may be 'close to impossible' due to IRGC
sanctions law, expert warns
-
Trump's $300B Iran investment fund faces legal roadblocks as expert warns
IRGC-controlled construction sector creates sanctions risks under existing
law.
21 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment