The case, Citizens United v. FEC, presents some very difficult free speech questions, and I'm deeply ambivalent about the court's ruling. There are several dubious aspects of the majority's opinion (principally its decision to invalidate the entire campaign finance scheme rather than exercising "judicial restraint" through a narrower holding). Beyond that, I believe that corporate influence over our political process is easily one of the top sicknesses afflicting our political culture. But there are also very real First Amendment interests implicated by laws which bar entities from spending money to express political viewpoints.
Man Charged With Helping California Fertility Clinic Bomber Dies in Custody
-
Daniel Park, 32, of Washington State, was found unresponsive Tuesday
morning and was later pronounced dead at the hospital, the authorities
said. No cause ...
25 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment