Reading Bobby Jindal's "Leadership and Crisis," (which is a decent book for the anecdotes, but nothing to write home about in terms of political persuasiveness - see "Audacity of Hope), I had a sudden thought:
Human nature drives our affairs, and its not always pretty, as psychology has showed. We as a species are capable mass rape, with slavery, with torture, just as we are also capable of loyalty, bravery, and decency. We have a range of motivations and methods to our mass thinking.
Conservatives see these motivations and seek to harness them - they are authentic, true, and powerful. Liberals see these motivations and imagine higher, purer ones - less authentic, but still true and powerful once nurtured. Witness the acceptance of all sexualities, the societal condemnation of racism and slavery. Each of these causes were taken up first by liberals, and achieved success upon the adaptation of conservatives.
In other words, liberals and the left are broadly like the US House of Representatives, and Conservatives like the Senate.
No doubt there are a million holes in this but (obviously) I think it was worth posting.
Iran’s new supreme leader is ‘his father on steroids,’ experts warn of
hardline rule
-
Mojtaba Khamenei reportedly selected as Iran's new supreme leader in
succession move, described as 'his father on steroids' with deeper security
ties.
28 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment