----------------------
Hey, Williams. My Winter Study sometimes takes me away from campus, and I was in northern Vermont during the Neighborhood Review Forum on Tuesday. Howeer, I heard that attendance was less than spectacular.
I know that talking about school policies is largely boring, and that we all have things we'd rather be doing than debate Proposal 3A versus Option 2B, but this shit really matters. Back in '05 when the system was first proposed, there were debates, open letters, and opposition organizations formed against the change. Many of those groups made points about weaknesses in the system that history has borne out, as seen in the first Neighborhood Review Committee report.
I'm told that because we had such poor attendance, the committee is about done soliciting for public opinion, and that's just sad. Possible changes are really big:
- Entries could be moved OUT OF Mission and Frosh Quad to all the upperclassmen dorms.
- Sophomores could be forced to live together in a designated area of campus.
- Free-Agency (being able to live wherever on campus) might return.
- We could get theme housing.
And for those who think that your lives are too busy, I quote Aroop Mukharji '09:
Don't have time? Shut your mouth. It's winter study.
It will help to have a sensationalist title to the post like, "Entries moved out of the frosh quad and mission."
ReplyDeleteAre they going to seek input from recent alums? probably not. But damn do I have a lot to say.
Send it to me if you've got it; I have several things from a variety of alums. BUT, no promises: I'm not on the committee, and at this point, the feelings of the current underclassmen probably matter most.
ReplyDeleteF the cluster system. Entries out of the froshquad? You have got to be kidding me! Older members of the Alumni Association are going to flip out. That is totally TOTALLY not ok.
ReplyDelete